Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unabsorbed depreciation of a registered firm, allocated to the partners and not fully set off in their individual assessments, could be brought back to the firm for carry forward and set off against the firm's income in the subsequent assessment years.
Analysis: The controversy was governed by the principle that unabsorbed depreciation of a registered firm, after allocation to partners and where it remained partly or wholly unabsorbed in their hands, had to be treated for later years as the firm's unabsorbed depreciation for purposes of computing the firm's total income. The issue stood concluded by the Supreme Court decisions holding that such balance depreciation could be brought back and carried forward for set off in the firm's subsequent assessments.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.