Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Magistrate, before taking cognizance on a private complaint, can direct investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and require registration of an FIR without first examining the complainant on oath; and whether the investigation under Section 156(3) is distinct from the investigation contemplated under Section 202(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Analysis: Section 156(3) falls within the chapter dealing with police powers to investigate cognizable offences and operates at the pre-cognizance stage. A Magistrate invoking that provision does not take cognizance of the offence and therefore is not bound to follow the procedure under Section 200. The investigation under Section 156(3) is the same regular police investigation contemplated by Chapter XII, which culminates in a report under Section 173, and the police must register an FIR where a cognizable offence is disclosed. By contrast, Section 202(1) applies after cognizance has been taken and authorises only a limited inquiry to enable the Magistrate to decide whether there is sufficient ground to proceed.
Conclusion: A Magistrate may, before taking cognizance, order investigation under Section 156(3) and direct registration of an FIR, without examining the complainant on oath; the investigation under Section 156(3) is distinct from the limited inquiry under Section 202(1). The view that a Magistrate has no power to direct registration of an FIR under Section 156(3) was rejected.