TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Validity of Tax Assessment Reopening: Court Emphasizes Procedural Compliance & Justifiability</h1> <h3>Shyam Sunder Gupta Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> Shyam Sunder Gupta Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax - [1998] 232 ITR 135, 138 CTR 130, 98 TAXMANN 86 Issues:1. Application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act for direction to Tribunal to state the case and refer proposed questions.2. Legality of jurisdiction for making fresh assessment by Assessing Officer.3. Justification of additions made during fresh assessment under section 143(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act.4. Justification of making fresh assessment in light of Benami Transactions Prohibition Act and Supreme Court judgment.5. Legality of making fresh assessment without following procedure under section 143(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act.6. Error by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in confirming addition based on forced concession by assessee.Analysis:The judgment pertains to an application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, where the applicant-assessee sought direction to the Tribunal to state the case and refer six questions arising from an order passed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 1985-86. The key issue revolved around the legality of the jurisdiction for making a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer without recording reasons for reopening the assessment under section 143(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal declined to state the case for all questions except question No. 2, emphasizing the Assessing Officer's satisfaction for reopening assessment. The court, however, held that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction must be based on proper reasons, citing the case law of Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 (SC) which stresses attaining finality in tax matters.The court found merit in considering question No. 2 and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer it for further examination. The judgment highlighted the importance of the Assessing Officer having the requisite jurisdiction based on valid reasons for reopening assessments. The applicant's counsel argued that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction cannot be unfettered and must be supported by proper reasons. The court's decision to allow the application in part and call for the reference of question No. 2 underscored the significance of ensuring procedural compliance and justifiability in tax assessments.Overall, the judgment focused on the procedural and jurisdictional aspects of making fresh assessments under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for proper reasons and adherence to statutory provisions. It delved into the legal principles governing tax matters and the importance of upholding fairness and legality in assessment procedures to achieve finality in tax disputes.
TaxTMI 