Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the depreciation allowance of Rs.12,52,117 for the current year was rightly set off against the profits of Rs.9,56,479 for that year rather than first setting off the loss of Rs.27,359 carried forward from earlier years.
Analysis: Proviso (b) to section 10(2)(vi) contemplates that any part of depreciation allowance not given effect to in a year is to be added to the allowance for the following year and treated as part of that allowance, subject to clause (b) of section 24(2). Clause (b) of section 24(2) prescribes a rule of priority applicable where carried forward depreciation and carried forward loss are both available at the same stage for set off, directing that carried forward loss be given effect to first. The operational sequence under the Act requires that the current year's depreciation be set off against current profits (under section 10(1) and section 24(1)) before any question of carried forward amounts and the priority under section 24(2)(b) arises. The phrase "also to be carried forward" in clause (b) indicates that the priority rule applies only where depreciation has already become a carried forward amount at the same procedural level as the carried forward loss. In the present facts the current year's depreciation had not reached that carried-forward stage when determining the year's net result; therefore the priority in section 24(2)(b) did not apply.
Conclusion: The depreciation allowance for the current year was correctly set off against the current year's profits before any set off of the carried forward loss; the claimed first set off of the earlier loss is not permissible in the circumstances.