Tribunal Affirms ALV Assessment, Rejects Notional Interest; Directs AO to Compute House Property Income Per Legal Standards.

The ITAT upheld the revenue authorities' determination of the ALV for the assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92, rejecting the assessee's claim to classify the income as business income. The Tribunal ruled that notional interest on interest-free deposits cannot be added as rent. The ALV was determined under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on fair rent. Consequently, the AO was directed to compute the house property income per legal standards, granting all permissible deductions. The assessee's appeals were partly allowed, affirming the ALV assessment while ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of Annual Letting Value (ALV) for the assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92.
2. Classification of the income as business income or income from house property.
3. Consideration of notional interest on interest-free deposits as part of the rent.

Summary:

1. Determination of Annual Letting Value (ALV):
The main issue was whether the revenue authorities correctly ascertained the ALV for the assessment years 1990-91 at Rs. 22,00,000 and 1991-92 at Rs. 22,69,000. The assessee owned premises at Sakhar Bhavan, Mumbai, and had an agreement with Citibank for a leave and licence basis. The agreement stipulated a monthly payment of Rs. 9,825 towards taxes and outgoings, which the assessee treated as licence fees. The Assessing Officer, however, determined the ALV based on the fair rent, considering the prevailing rate of rent in the area, and concluded that the rateable value provided by the assessee was incorrect and significantly low.

2. Classification of Income:
The assessee argued that the amount received should be treated as business income. However, this ground was not seriously pressed due to the Supreme Court's decision in United Commercial Bank Ltd. v. CIT, which held that income must be charged under the specific head it falls under. The Tribunal emphasized that the income derived from the exploitation of the property should be charged under the head "income from house property."

3. Consideration of Notional Interest:
The Tribunal discussed whether the value of benefits given in lieu of rent could be assessed as rent. It was concluded that no addition is possible with reference to notional interest on interest-free deposits. The ALV should be determined under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, considering the fair rent. The Tribunal noted that the actual rent or real rent of the property was not stipulated in the agreement, and the amount of Rs. 9,825 was only reimbursement for taxes and outgoings, not licence fees. The usufructus of the deposit amount was considered the consideration for the user of the property, and the Assessing Officer correctly determined the ALV by considering the usufructus from the security deposit as rent.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal confirmed the revenue authorities' determination of the ALV and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the house property income in accordance with the law, allowing all permissible deductions. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed.

---