Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, who had purchased shares but was not registered in the company's books as shareholder, could claim the benefit of grossing up and tax credit in respect of dividends under section 16(2) and section 18(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The right to have dividend grossed up under section 16(2) and to obtain credit for tax under section 18(5) arises only where the dividend is paid by the company to its registered shareholder. An amount received by a purchaser from the vendor shareholder, even though equivalent to dividend, is not a dividend paid by the company to the purchaser. Section 18(5) also makes it clear that the statutory benefit is confined to the shareholder. The further question whether other evidence could replace the certificate under section 20 was treated as unnecessary once the assessee was found not to be entitled to the substantive benefit of those provisions.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to invoke section 16(2) or section 18(5) in respect of the amount received, and the claim was answered against the assessee.