1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal reclassifies imported goods as semi-precious stones under Tariff Entry 71.02(5)</h1> The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods as semi-precious stones under Tariff Entry 71.02(5) instead of the appellant's preferred entry. ... - Issues:1. Classification of goods for customs duty purposes under the Customs Act, 1962.2. Proper filing of documents and compliance with requisition notice by the appellant.3. Justification for assessing goods under specific tariff entries.4. Correct classification of imported goods under the Indian Customs Tariff.Detailed Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a Revision Application filed by M/s. Bharat Electronics Ltd., challenging an order passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Madras, regarding the classification of imported goods for customs duty purposes. The appellant sought classification under Tariff Entry No. 85.18-27(1) but was assessed under Tariff Entry No. 38.01/19(1) of the Indian Customs Tariff, 1975. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, upheld the classification under Tariff Entry 71.02(5) instead, based on the description of the goods as 'Quartz crystal natural unworked or worked not mounted.'2. The appellant failed to file the original order of assessment passed by the Assistant Collector along with the Revision Petition, despite being required to do so. The Tribunal issued a requisition notice for the necessary documents, including copies of the Revision Petition, original order appealed against, and other relevant documents. However, the appellant did not comply with the requisition notice, leading to the Tribunal proceeding with the matter based on the documents already submitted.3. The Tribunal scrutinized the order-in-appeal and found that the justification for assessing the goods under Tariff Entry 38.01/19(1) was lacking. This entry pertained to chemical products, while the imported goods were described as Quartz crystal natural unworked or worked not mounted, indicating they were not chemical products. The Tribunal concluded that the goods should be classified under Tariff Entry 71.02(5) as semi-precious stones, despite the duty rate being the same under both entries. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correct classification for customs duty purposes.4. The Tribunal carefully considered the classification issue and determined that the imported goods should be classified under Tariff Entry 71.02(5) of the Indian Customs Tariff, aligning with the description of the goods as semi-precious stones. The appeal was allowed based on this reclassification, highlighting the significance of accurate classification under the customs regulations.