First taxable sale of broiler chicken denied presumptive tax where reared chicks became commercially different goods.

Sale of full-grown broiler chicken after rearing one- or two-day-old chicks was treated as the first taxable sale because the chicks purchased and the broilers sold were not the same goods in commercial identity, value, or use. The Court noted that substantial rearing under controlled feeding, temperature, medication, and care changed the commodity into marketable broiler chicken sold for meat value. Presumptive tax under section 6(5) was therefore unavailable, and the dealers were held to be first taxable sellers.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sale of full-grown broiler chicken after rearing one- or two-day-old chicks in the poultry farm amounted to a first taxable sale, disentitling the dealers to presumptive tax under section 6(5) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: The entitlement to presumptive tax under section 6(5) was unavailable to a dealer effecting the first taxable sale of goods. The relevant enquiry was whether the commodity purchased and the commodity sold were the same. The chicks purchased by the dealers underwent substantial rearing under controlled feeding, temperature, medication, and care, and emerged as full-grown broiler chicken sold by weight for meat value. The Court held that the chicks and the broilers were not the same goods in commercial identity, value, or use. The statutory concept of first taxable sale therefore applied, and the argument that the sale was only a second sale was rejected.

Conclusion: The dealers were first taxable sellers of broiler chicken and were not entitled to presumptive tax under section 6(5) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

---