TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the fabrics cleared by the petitioners were bona fide cut pieces or fents entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 80/69, and whether penalty under Rule 173Q was justified; (ii) Whether duty could be demanded without a proper show cause notice and compliance with natural justice.
Issue (i): Whether the fabrics cleared by the petitioners were bona fide cut pieces or fents entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 80/69, and whether penalty under Rule 173Q was justified.
Analysis: The goods were found to be fabrics of uniform length deliberately cut and not bona fide cut pieces or fents. On that basis, the benefit of the exemption notification was not available. The finding also supported penal action under Rule 173Q.
Conclusion: The exemption claim failed and the penalty was sustained, against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether duty could be demanded without a proper show cause notice and compliance with natural justice.
Analysis: Liability to duty and demand of duty were treated as distinct matters. Although the goods were held dutiable, a demand could not be sustained unless preceded by a proper show cause notice. As no such notice had been issued for demand on the eight cases, the demand order was set aside with liberty to proceed afresh after due notice.
Conclusion: The demand for duty was set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded only on the demand issue, while the finding denying exemption and sustaining penalty remained undisturbed; the matter on duty demand was remitted for fresh action in accordance with natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: Even where goods are found dutiable, a demand cannot be sustained unless it is preceded by a proper show cause notice and observance of natural justice; exemption claims founded on a notification fail where the goods are not shown to answer its terms.
TaxTMI 
