Exemption for agarbatti turns on proof of goods' nature; seizure failed without reliable testing of incense sticks.

Incense sticks seized in transit were treated as exempt agarbatti under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, so no import declaration form was required. The statutory scheme under section 50 applies only to goods outside the First Schedule, while section 7(b) read with entry 41 exempts agarbatti. Because the Department relied only on visual inspection and produced no chemical test, burn test, or other reliable material to prove the goods were not incense sticks capable of emitting fragrance on burning, it failed to establish that the goods were taxable. The seizure could not be sustained on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether incense sticks seized in transit were exempt goods under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 so that no import declaration form was required, and whether the seizure could be sustained on the basis that the goods were not actually agarbatti.

Analysis: Under section 50 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, an import declaration form is required only for goods other than those named in the First Schedule. Section 7(b) and entry 41 of the First Schedule exempt incense sticks commonly known as agarbatti. The only controversy was whether the seized goods were in fact agarbatti. The finding that the sticks were unscented was recorded only on visual inspection, without any chemical test or test by burning, and there was no material to show that the goods would not emit fragrance on burning. In the absence of reliable testing, the Department failed to prove that the goods were not agarbatti.

Conclusion: The seized goods were held to be agarbatti and therefore exempt from tax. No import declaration form was required, and the seizure could not be sustained.

---