Commercial parlance test governs octroi classification of plastic resins, extending broadly worded entries to primary and secondary forms.

Octroi classification turns on commercial parlance and the context of the entry, not on technical composition alone. Broadly worded plastic entries were treated as covering plastic material in primary or secondary form, including PVC resin in powder form, rather than sending it to the chemical entry merely because of its scientific description. The same approach applied to synthetic hydrocarbon resin, which was treated as falling within the plastic category and not as a separate non-plastic commodity. The stated ratio is that a broadly framed plastic entry extends to goods understood commercially as plastic unless the schedule clearly indicates a narrower exclusion.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether PVC resin in powder form falls within the octroi entries for plastic, plastic goods, or plastic powder, or is classifiable as chemicals; (ii) Whether synthetic hydrocarbon resin is to be treated as plastic and plastic goods or plastic powder for octroi purposes.

Issue (i): Whether PVC resin in powder form falls within the octroi entries for plastic, plastic goods, or plastic powder, or is classifiable as chemicals.

Analysis: The relevant octroi schedules used broad commercial descriptions and not a highly scientific tariff scheme. In taxing entries of this kind, the controlling test is the meaning of the goods in commercial parlance. The expression "plastic, plastic goods and plastic powder" was read as covering plastic material in primary as well as secondary forms. Technical literature was treated as insufficient to displace the ordinary understanding of the entry. On that basis, PVC resin in powder form was held not to fall under the chemical entry merely because of its technical composition.

Conclusion: PVC resin in powder form falls within the plastic entry and not under chemicals.

Issue (ii): Whether synthetic hydrocarbon resin is to be treated as plastic and plastic goods or plastic powder for octroi purposes.

Analysis: The same commercial and contextual approach governed the second issue. Synthetic hydrocarbon resin was treated as falling on the same footing as synthetic plastic, and the presence of a separate entry for plastic powder did not exclude it from the plastic category. The Court declined the contention that hydrocarbon resin was wholly distinct from plastic for the purpose of octroi classification.

Conclusion: Synthetic hydrocarbon resin is to be treated as plastic for octroi purposes and not as a separate non-plastic commodity.

Final Conclusion: The octroi classification adopted by the municipal authorities was upheld, and the challenge to levy under the plastic entries failed.

Ratio Decidendi: For octroi classification, a commodity must be identified according to its commercial parlance meaning and the context of the entry, and a broadly worded plastic entry extends to plastic material in primary or secondary form unless the schedule clearly indicates a narrower exclusion.

---