Defective show-cause notice invalidates penalty proceedings where the required gist of accusation is omitted.

A show-cause notice issued before penalty proceedings must disclose the gist of the accusation and give a reasonable opportunity to respond. Because the notice here did not state that the goods were alleged to have been transported with intent to evade tax, it failed to satisfy Rule 19(1). The defect went to the root of the initiation of proceedings, so the taxpayer's reply and the final penalty order could not cure the illegality. The initiation was therefore invalid and the penalty order was vitiated.

---

---

Issues: Whether the initiation of proceedings and the penalty order under section 31 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 were vitiated because the notice did not contain the gist of the accusation required by rule 19(1) of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983.

Analysis: Rule 19(1) required the prescribed authority, before initiating proceedings under section 31, to set out the gist of the accusation and afford a reasonable opportunity to answer it. The notice dated 4.1.1992 did not disclose that the goods were alleged to have been transported in a manner intended to evade tax, and therefore did not satisfy the statutory requirement. Since the very foundation of the proceeding was defective, the subsequent reply and the final order could not cure the illegality in initiation.

Conclusion: The initiation of proceedings was invalid and the penalty order was vitiated.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute requires the show-cause notice to contain the gist of the accusation before penalty proceedings are initiated, omission of that requirement invalidates the entire proceeding and any order passed thereon.

---