Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on tax deductions for windmill income and machinery depreciation</h1> <h3>Preetam Enterprises Versus Jt. CIT Range 1, Kolhapur</h3> Preetam Enterprises Versus Jt. CIT Range 1, Kolhapur - TMI Issues Involved:1. Rejection of claim of deduction u/s 80-IA(iv)(a) on income generated from the windmill.2. Entitlement for depreciation on machinery used in job work done by assessee's vendors.3. Estimating selling and administrative expenses attributable to windmill.4. Revision of AO's order by CIT invoking provisions of section 263 for A.Y. 2004-05 and 2005-06.5. Claim of deduction u/s 80-IA/80-IB on income from machining charges, sale of scrap, DEPB sale, turnover tax, and surcharge refund on purchases.Summary:1. Rejection of Claim of Deduction u/s 80-IA(iv)(a) on Income Generated from the Windmill:The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80-IA(iv)(a) was based on the provisions amended by the Finance Act 1999, allowing a ten-year deduction period within the first fifteen years of business commencement. The assessee exercised this option in A.Y. 2004-05. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (231 CTR 368), which held that losses and depreciation from earlier years absorbed against other business profits cannot be notionally carried forward and set off against profits for computing the deduction u/s 80-IA. Thus, the issue was decided in favor of the assessee.2. Entitlement for Depreciation on Machinery Used in Job Work Done by Assessee's Vendors:The Tribunal examined whether the machinery supplied to vendors for job work was used for the assessee's business. It was established that the vendors substantially worked for the assessee, and the ownership and usage of the machinery were not doubted. Citing the decision of the Madras High Court in CIT vs. Indian Express (255 ITR 68 Mad.), the Tribunal concluded that the machinery was used exclusively for the assessee's business, thus entitling the assessee to claim depreciation. The Tribunal reversed the findings of the lower authorities and allowed the claim.3. Estimating Selling and Administrative Expenses Attributable to Windmill:The assessee maintained separate accounts for the windmill division and contended that only directly relatable expenses should be allocated while computing the deduction u/s 80-IA. The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to verify the maintenance of separate books of account and decide accordingly, providing an opportunity for a hearing to the assessee.4. Revision of AO's Order by CIT Invoking Provisions of Section 263 for A.Y. 2004-05 and 2005-06:The CIT revised the AO's order for A.Y. 2004-05 and 2005-06, invoking section 263, following the view taken in A.Y. 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the AO had adopted a possible view in line with the decision of the Chennai Tribunal in Mohan Breweries and Distilleries Ltd. v. ACIT (114 TTJ 532). Citing the Supreme Court decision in Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. Vs. CIT (243 ITR 83 SC), the Tribunal held that the CIT was not justified in invoking section 263 and allowed the assessee's appeals.5. Claim of Deduction u/s 80-IA/80-IB on Income from Machining Charges, Sale of Scrap, DEPB Sale, Turnover Tax, and Surcharge Refund on Purchases:The Tribunal referred to the decision in Ramchandra Enterprises (ITA No. 1066, 1067/PN/2008 and 353/PN/2009) and allowed the claim of deduction u/s 80-IB on income from machining charges and scrap sale, as these were directly linked to the manufacturing activity. However, the claim for deduction on DEPB sale, turnover tax, and surcharge refund was decided against the assessee, following the Supreme Court decision in Liberty India Vs. CIT (317 ITR 218 SC) and S.N. Gupta (297 ITR 322 SC).Conclusion:The assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 was partly allowed, appeals for A.Y. 2004-05 and 2005-06 were allowed, and the Revenue's appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 was partly allowed. The judgment was pronounced in the open court on 29th April 2011.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found