1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Dismissal of Writ Petition on Tax Liability Challenge under Section 17(D)</h1> The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appellate authority's procedure in entertaining an appeal against an assessment conducted under ... - Issues involved: Challenge to the course and procedure followed by the appellate authority in entertaining the appeal against assessment conducted u/s 17(D); Oppression in satisfying entire tax liability for availing appellate remedy; Validity of stipulation u/s 17D(5); Precedents set by Division Bench and Supreme Court regarding tax liability at the time of filing appeal.Summary:The petitioner challenged the course and procedure followed by the appellate authority in entertaining the appeal against the assessment conducted u/s 17(D). The petitioner argued that being compelled to satisfy the entire tax liability to avail of the statutory remedy through appeal rendered the remedy meaningless and oppressive. The petitioner also contested the stipulation u/s 17D(5) as oppressive in nature.The learned Government Pleader, however, referred to the Division Bench's decision in Viani Papers v. Fast Track Team, where the validity of the provision was upheld. Additionally, the apex court's ruling in Ravi Gupta v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi, which addressed the liability to pay tax at the time of filing the appeal, was cited as a precedent that bars the petitioner's way.Given the legal position already established against the petitioner by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court precedents, the court found no grounds for interference. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.