Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee's Tax Penalty Review & Exemption Clarification</h1> <h3>Grand Motors Sales Corporation Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram</h3> The judgment addressed the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for alleged evasion of sales tax ... Penalty levied under section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for alleged evasion of sales tax due for 2000-01 - whether assessee is entitled to rebate of tax to the extent paid in Kerala for the purchase of chassis as well as for the body built thereon? Held that:- What is required to be proved for rebate is that the tax in fact is paid on chassis or body built thereon and the amount so paid. The payment of tax is obviously by body builder no matter whether it is recovered by the body builder from the assessee or not. However, without proof of payment of tax on the chassis and the body built thereon, the assessee is not entitled to rebate of tax. We clarify this position with direction to the assessing officer to modify the assessment after giving an opportunity to the assessee to produce documents pertaining to payment of tax on the body built on the chassis of each vehicle sold by the assessee. If the assessing officer has already modified the assessment granting exemption pursuant to the Tribunal's order, he shall rectify the assessment by following the above directions. In view of the direction issued by us, we direct the intelligence officer to reconsider the penalty orders also after receipt of revised order from the assessing officer, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and to produce documents in the matter. If there is no scope for levy of penalty, then based on the revised order passed by the assessing officer, the intelligence officer will drop the proceedings for penalty. However, if there is no scope for levying penalty, he will issue notice to the assessee and issue fresh penalty orders. Issues:Penalty under section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for alleged evasion of sales tax due for 2000-01.Analysis:The judgment addressed the penalty levied on the assessee under section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for alleged evasion of sales tax due for 2000-01. The assessee, a dealer in automobiles, claimed exemption on the sales turnover of vehicles, arguing that the chassis and body built thereon had separately suffered tax. However, as no evidence was provided regarding the payment of tax for the body built on the chassis, the assessing officer imposed tax. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim for exemption but found it untenable as the relevant entry only allowed for a rebate of tax on the tax paid on chassis and body built thereon. The judgment clarified that the liability of the assessee to pay tax on the sales turnover of motor vehicles is absolute, and the assessing officer must grant rebate on tax paid if proof is provided. The assessee cannot claim second sale exemption on the vehicle by treating it as a second sale since the sale of the motor vehicle as a whole is considered the first sale in the State.The judgment emphasized that the assessee is entitled to a rebate of tax to the extent paid in Kerala for the purchase of chassis and the body built thereon. The assessee must provide proof of payment of tax by the body builder for the body built on the chassis to claim the rebate. Even if the body builder did not initially collect tax, if proof of tax payment for each vehicle is produced, the assessee should receive the rebate. The judgment directed the assessing officer to modify the assessment after allowing the assessee to produce documents related to tax payment on the body built on the chassis of each vehicle sold. The intelligence officer was instructed to reconsider the penalty orders after receiving the revised assessment, providing the assessee with an opportunity to be heard and present relevant documents. If there is no basis for imposing a penalty, the proceedings will be dropped; otherwise, fresh penalty orders will be issued based on the revised assessment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found