Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Importance of Proper Delegation in Tax Jurisdiction: Court Rules on Officer's Powers</h1> The High Court held that the Sales Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue orders under section 30AA of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act without a valid ... Whether the concerned Sales Tax Officer had necessary jurisdiction to pass the order under section 30AA of the Act cancelling the registration of the appellant? Held that:- The question is answered in the negative, that is, the Tribunal was not justified in holding that the Sales Tax Officer is presumed to have necessary jurisdiction to make orders under subsection (2)(a) of section 30AA of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 (the Act) in absence of any order having been placed on record to show that the powers of the Commissioner of Sales Tax had actually been delegated to the Sales Tax Officer under section 30AA of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. The Impugned orders passed by the Tribunal as well as the lower appellate authority and the Sales Tax Officer are hereby quashed and set aside. Issues involved:Jurisdiction of Sales Tax Officer under section 30AA of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.Analysis:1. Jurisdiction of Sales Tax Officer under Section 30AA:The primary issue in this case revolved around whether the Sales Tax Officer had the necessary jurisdiction to issue an order under section 30AA of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. The appellant contended that the powers under section 30AA were vested in the Commissioner of Sales Tax and could only be exercised by the Sales Tax Officer if such powers were delegated to him under section 27(6) of the Act. The appellant argued that without a valid delegation of powers, the order cancelling registration was without jurisdiction. On the other hand, the Assistant Government Pleader supported the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had presumed that the Sales Tax Officer had necessary jurisdiction based on the official acts being deemed to have been done properly, despite the lack of evidence of delegation of powers.2. Legal Provisions and Delegation of Powers:Section 30AA of the Act deals with the cancellation of a certificate of registration in specific circumstances. The Act provides for delegation of powers under section 27(6), where the Commissioner can delegate powers to Assistant Commissioners of Sales Tax, Sales Tax Officers, and other officers. In this case, the Commissioner had delegated powers under section 30AA to Assistant Commissioners of Sales Tax only, as evidenced by an order dated July 8, 1994. The absence of any delegation of powers to the Sales Tax Officer meant that he did not have the jurisdiction to make orders under section 30AA.3. Tribunal's Decision and Legal Analysis:The Tribunal had dismissed the appellant's appeal, stating that the issue of jurisdiction was raised for the first time before them and that the appellant failed to provide evidence of delegation of powers. However, it is established that the issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any point, especially when there are statutory provisions governing the delegation of powers. The Tribunal erred in presuming the Sales Tax Officer's jurisdiction without concrete evidence of delegation. The burden of proof was incorrectly placed on the appellant, and the absence of any subsequent delegation orders confirmed that the Sales Tax Officer lacked the necessary jurisdiction.4. Final Judgment and Conclusion:The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the Sales Tax Officer did not have the necessary jurisdiction to make orders under section 30AA without a valid delegation of powers from the Commissioner. The Tribunal's decision was overturned, and the orders of the lower authorities were quashed. The appeal was allowed with no costs imposed.In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the importance of valid delegation of powers in determining the jurisdiction of officers under specific legal provisions, emphasizing that official acts cannot be presumed to have been regularly performed without evidence of proper authorization.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found