Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether paddy husk was taxable under the trade tax law, and (ii) whether tax was payable on packing material sold along with rice when no separate price was realised.
Issue (i): Whether paddy husk was taxable under the trade tax law.
Analysis: The controversy regarding paddy husk was treated as settled by earlier binding precedent holding that paddy husk is cattle fodder and therefore not taxable. Following that view, no error was found in the Tribunal's order on this issue.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether tax was payable on packing material sold along with rice when no separate price was realised.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found that the packing material was purchased within the State, was sold along with rice, and that no separate amount was charged from customers for it. In that situation, and in view of section 3AB of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, the levy on packing material was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The revisions failed on both issues, and the Tribunal's order declining tax on paddy husk and packing material was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods shown to be cattle fodder are not taxable as such, and packing material sold along with the principal goods without any separate realization of price is not liable to tax under section 3AB of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.