1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court dismisses revision, defers 'makka poha' taxability decision for assessment proceedings. Disputes to follow regular assessment procedures.</h1> The court dismissed the revision, emphasizing that the determination of whether 'makka poha' is taxable should be addressed during assessment proceedings. ... - Issues Involved:1. Controversy over seizure and security demand for goods 'makka poha'2. Classification of goods as taxable or exempted3. Interpretation of relevant legal provisions for assessmentAnalysis:1. The primary issue in this case is whether the goods 'makka poha' were rightfully seized and if the demand for security for releasing the goods was justified. The Department argued that the commodity is unclassified and taxable at 2%, while the dealer-opposite party claimed it to be an exempted item, equating it to 'kachri.' The court referred to a previous judgment where it was held that the goods cannot be seized, and the question of taxability should be addressed during assessment proceedings.2. The court emphasized that the determination of whether 'makka poha' is taxable as 'kachri' or an unclassified item should be examined during the assessment process. It was noted that the dealer was registered, had not misrepresented the goods, and the authorities had preserved a sample for final assessment. The Tribunal rightly refrained from making a definitive statement on taxability, stating that such disputes should be resolved in regular assessment proceedings and not ancillary ones.3. Ultimately, the court dismissed the revision while clarifying that this dismissal should not be interpreted as a ruling on the taxability of 'maize flakes' as a non-taxable item or as part of 'kachri.' The court left this issue open for adjudication by the relevant authority in the appropriate proceeding. No costs were awarded in this judgment.By providing a detailed analysis of the controversy surrounding the seizure and taxability of 'makka poha,' the court highlighted the importance of addressing such issues through proper assessment procedures, ensuring fairness and clarity in tax matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
