TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Manufacturer wins appeal on tax classification for 'Vicks' products under Kerala VAT Act</h1> <h3>Proctor and Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram</h3> Proctor and Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram - [2010] 36 VST 263 (Ker) Issues Involved:1. Maintainability of the appeal.2. Classification of 'Vicks' products under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.3. Applicability of Rules of Interpretation to the classification of 'Vicks' products.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Maintainability of the Appeal:The appellant, a manufacturer of 'Vicks' products, challenged an order of clarification issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. A preliminary objection was raised regarding the maintainability of the appeal since the clarification was sought by a dealer, not the appellant. The court held that under Section 94(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the Commissioner's clarification is binding on all subordinate authorities, and since the appellant is affected by this order, they are an 'aggrieved person' with the right to appeal under Section 62. The appeal was filed within 90 days from the date of knowledge of the order, making it timely and maintainable. The court referenced a similar view taken in P.O. Abraham Associates v. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, reinforcing the appellant's right to appeal.2. Classification of 'Vicks' Products:The primary issue was whether 'Vicks' products should be classified under entry 36 of the Third Schedule of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, which pertains to drugs and medicines, or under entry 24(1) of S.R.O. No. 82/2006, which pertains to confectionery and is taxable at 12.5%. The Commissioner had classified 'Vicks' tablets and balm as confectionery, taxable at 12.5%. However, the court examined various precedents, including the classification of 'Halls' ayurvedic tablets and 'Vicks Vaporub' under similar contexts, which were considered drugs or ayurvedic medicines. The court noted that 'Vicks' products, manufactured under a drug license and containing medicinal ingredients, should be classified as medicines under entry 36, attracting a tax rate of 4%.3. Applicability of Rules of Interpretation:The Commissioner had relied on clause 23 of the Rules of Interpretation to differentiate 'Vicks' products from those classified under entry 36. However, the court found that rule 23, which excludes certain food and beverage products from being classified as medicines, did not apply to 'Vicks' products. The court emphasized that 'Vicks' products are recognized as ayurvedic preparations in common parlance and are manufactured under a drug license, thus fitting within the definition of medicines under entry 36. The court concluded that rule 23 did not affect the classification of 'Vicks' products as medicines.Conclusion:The court set aside the Commissioner's order, declaring that 'Vicks' products, including Vicks Vaporub and tablets, are classifiable under entry 36 of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, attracting a tax rate of 4%. The appeal was allowed with no costs.
TaxTMI 