Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on the refunded entry tax amount under the Interest Act, 1978, when the amount had been deposited voluntarily and no fiduciary relationship existed between the parties.
Analysis: Interest can be awarded in tax matters only where it is authorised by the relevant enactment, agreement, or another recognised rule of law. Section 4(1) of the Interest Act, 1978 was inapplicable because the claim did not arise from any existing legal entitlement to interest under the entry tax law. Section 4(2)(b) also did not assist the petitioner, because a fiduciary relationship requires a relationship of trust, confidence, dominance, or agency-like responsibility. The correspondence showed that the petitioner itself requested calculation of entry tax and remitted the amount to obtain registration, without any prior demand by the department. The deposit was therefore voluntary, and no fiduciary relationship arose. Interest could not be granted merely on equitable grounds.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to interest on the refunded amount.