TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms tax evasion goods detention decision, emphasizing legal procedures</h1> The court upheld the authorities' decision to detain goods under suspicion of tax evasion, setting aside the single Judge's interim order for release. ... - Issues:Challenge to notice issued under section 29A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.Analysis:The judgment of the court addressed the challenge to the notice issued under section 29A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Intelligence Inspector, along with others, challenged the judgment quashing the notice. The original petitioner, a company engaged in electrical contracts, contested the detention of goods and demanded their release on producing registration certificates. The single Judge passed an interim order allowing the release of goods on a security bond. The goods were released, but the petitioner could not be located, leading to the declaration of service completion. The petitioner argued that the goods were transported without proper documents but should still be released. However, the court found sufficient reasons for detaining the goods, as they were not declared at border check-posts, indicating a potential tax evasion attempt.The court emphasized that suspicion is the initial stage of forming an opinion, and interference at the notice stage was not justified. The single Judge's intervention was deemed unwarranted as the authorities had valid reasons for detaining the goods. Despite attempts to issue notices to the consignor and consignee, no response was received, further supporting the suspicion of tax evasion. The judgment set aside the single Judge's decision and allowed the authorities to proceed with further action based on the notice and related proceedings. The court highlighted that the state suffered losses due to tax evasion, underscoring the importance of upholding the legal procedures outlined in section 29A of the Act.In conclusion, the writ appeal was disposed of, and the order on the related application was dismissed. The judgment reinforced the authority of officers to detain goods under suspicion of tax evasion, emphasizing the significance of following legal procedures and respecting the powers granted under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
