Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions challenging the revisional assessment orders were maintainable in the face of an efficacious statutory appellate remedy, and whether the alleged denial of copies of records and cross-examination justified interference under writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The writ petitions arose from revision of sales tax assessments under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, with the petitioners alleging breach of natural justice for want of disclosure of materials and denial of cross-examination. The Court noted the availability of a statutory appeal remedy and applied the settled principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an efficacious alternative remedy exists, unless the impugned action is shown to be ultra vires or in violation of natural justice. The Court found that the petitioners had not made out a sufficient case to bypass the appellate remedy and held that the earlier Division Bench order permitting statutory appeals on specified conditions would govern the present matters.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not entertained and were dismissed, with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy on the conditions indicated.