Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coercive recovery of the reversed input tax credit could be pursued pending the petitioner's statutory appeal, and whether the petitioner should be permitted to challenge the assessment before the appellate authority.
Analysis: The impugned assessment related to reversal of input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court noted that the petitioner was willing to avail the statutory appellate remedy and that the dispute involved factual findings which could be agitated before the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the Court directed that the petitioner be allowed to prefer an appeal within the stipulated time. The Court also directed withdrawal of the communication sent to the bank for realisation of the disputed amount, so that recovery would not be pursued in that manner while the appellate remedy was available.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appeal, and the coercive recovery step directed to the bank was withdrawn.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of with protection against immediate recovery and with liberty to work out the statutory appellate remedy.
Ratio Decidendi: When a statutory appeal is available against an assessment, coercive recovery of the disputed demand should not be pressed in a manner that defeats the appellate remedy.