Technical omissions in transport documents cannot justify KGST penalty without material showing real tax evasion.

Penalty under the KGST Act could not be sustained where the goods were accompanied by substantially complete statutory transport documents and the only defects were technical omissions, including failure to mention the consignee's registration number. The court accepted that the omission was inadvertent, noted that the registration certificate and books of account were produced, and found no material showing non-accounting of the goods or intent to evade tax. A presumption of evasion based on the first rail transport and minor address discrepancies was held unsustainable, and the penalty orders were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained for alleged technical omissions in the transport/invoice documents, and whether the presumption of attempted evasion was justified in the absence of material indicating non-accounting of the goods.

Analysis: The goods were accompanied by relevant documents, and the omission to mention the consignee's registration number in the invoices was explained as inadvertent. The registration certificate was produced during the enquiry and the books of account reflected the transaction. The statutory documents required under the KGST Act were therefore substantially available. A presumption of evasion based merely on the fact that the goods were transported by rail for the first time, and on minor discrepancies in the address particulars, was held to be unsustainable. The authorities had proceeded on suspicion and technical breach rather than on any real material showing tax evasion.

Conclusion: Penalty under the KGST Act could not be imposed on the basis of such technical omissions and unsupported presumptions, and the assessee succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The penalty orders were set aside and the revision petition was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A penalty for alleged evasion under the KGST Act cannot be sustained where the statutory transport documents substantially accompany the goods and the alleged defect is only a technical or inadvertent omission unaccompanied by material showing intent to evade tax.

---