Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Upholds Taxability of Air-Conditioning Plant Installation Contract</h1> <h3>Voltas Ltd. Versus State of Gujarat</h3> Voltas Ltd. Versus State of Gujarat - [2007] 5 VST 504 (Guj) Issues Involved:1. Classification of the works contract for fabrication and installation of air-conditioning plants under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.2. Determination of the applicable tax rate under the relevant entries of the Schedule to the notification issued under section 55A of the Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Works Contract:The core issue was whether the works contract for the fabrication and installation of air-conditioning plants should be classified under entry 2 or entry 5 of the Schedule to the notification dated October 18, 1993, issued under section 55A of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. Entry 2 pertains to the 'installation of air-conditioners and A.C. coolers' with a tax rate of 15%, while entry 5 pertains to the 'fabrication and installation of plant and machinery' with a tax rate of 5%.2. Determination of Applicable Tax Rate:The Tribunal had held that the works contract for air-conditioning plants falls under entry 2 and is taxable at 15%. The company argued that the term 'air-conditioners' in entry 2 connotes room or window air-conditioners and not large air-conditioning plants, which should fall under entry 5. The Deputy Commissioner and the Tribunal both concluded that the air-conditioning plant is covered by entry 2, as it involves the installation of a system that controls temperature, humidity, and air purity, similar to air-conditioners and A.C. coolers.Detailed Judgment Analysis:Background:M/s. Voltas Limited, engaged in the design, supply, and installation of air-conditioning plants, considered these activities as indivisible works contracts. The company sought clarification on whether the tax rate for their works contract should be 5% under entry 5 or 15% under entry 2 of the Schedule to the notification.Tribunal's Findings:The Tribunal observed that the installation of air-conditioning plants involves the production of cooling air, unlike simple plant and machinery installations. It emphasized that if the government intended to provide a separate benefit for air-conditioning plants, it would have created a distinct entry. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that entry 2, which specifically mentions air-conditioners and A.C. coolers, includes air-conditioning plants.Arguments by the Assessee:The assessee contended that 'air-conditioners' in entry 2 should be interpreted to mean room or window air-conditioners, and not comprehensive air-conditioning plants. They argued that the fabrication and installation of air-conditioning plants require detailed planning and layout, fitting more appropriately under entry 5.Arguments by the Revenue:The Revenue argued that air-conditioning plants function similarly to air-conditioners and A.C. coolers by controlling temperature, humidity, and air purity. They emphasized that the notification should be construed strictly, and in case of doubt, in favor of the Revenue. They asserted that the air-conditioning plant falls under entry 2 due to its functional similarity with air-conditioners and A.C. coolers.Court's Analysis:The court referred to dictionary definitions and industry standards to conclude that air-conditioning plants and air-conditioners share fundamental similarities in controlling air conditions. The court noted that the basic components and functions of air-conditioning plants are akin to those of room or window air-conditioners, albeit on a larger scale.Conclusion:The court upheld the Tribunal's view that the works contract for the installation of air-conditioning plants falls under entry 2 of the Schedule to the notification, making it taxable at 15%. The court emphasized that the specific entry for air-conditioners and A.C. coolers prevails over the general entry for plant and machinery. The reference was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the Special Civil Application was disposed of accordingly, with the interim relief vacated.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found