Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules JCB loader taxable under the Act, sets aside assessment for HMT 2522 Tractor, directs reassessment.</h1> The court upheld the assessment of the JCB loader for entry tax, ruling it exigible to tax under the Act. The limitation provision did not apply due to ... - Issues:Assessment of JCB loader for entry tax under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994.Assessment of HMT 2522 Tractor for entry tax under the Act.Validity of assessment order and demand notices challenged in writ petition.Applicability of limitation provision under section 8(5) of the Act.Power of the assessing authority to make assessments under the Act.Claim for reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State.Exigibility to tax under the Act on the tractor purchased and registered outside the State.Analysis:1. Assessment of JCB Loader:The petitioner challenged the assessment of the JCB loader for entry tax under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act. The petitioner contended that the assessment order was barred by limitation under section 8(5) of the Act. The counsel also argued that the respondent lacked the power to make assessments under the Act. Additionally, the petitioner claimed entitlement to a reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State. The court noted that the JCB loader was indeed a motor vehicle exigible to tax under the Act. However, since no return was filed by the petitioner, the limitation provision of section 8(5) did not apply. The court directed the assessing authority to consider the claim for reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State.2. Assessment of HMT 2522 Tractor:Regarding the assessment of the HMT 2522 Tractor for entry tax, the petitioner argued that the tractor was not exigible to tax under the Act as it was registered under the Motor Vehicles Act in Tamil Nadu. The court observed that the definition of 'motor vehicles' in the Motor Vehicles Act applied, and since a tractor fell under this definition, the petitioner's tractor was registered as a motor vehicle in Coimbatore. The court directed the assessing authority to reconsider the claim of the petitioner in respect of the tractor and set aside the assessment orders for further review.3. Validity of Assessment Order and Demand Notices:The petitioner challenged the validity of the assessment order and demand notices in the writ petition. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contention that the assessment was incorrect. It clarified that technical irregularities in the assessing authority's designation did not prejudice the petitioner's case.4. Applicability of Limitation Provision:The court analyzed the limitation provision under section 8(5) of the Act and determined that it applied only when a return was filed under the Act. In cases where no return was filed, the provisions of the Act allowed for best judgment assessment by the assessing authority.5. Power of Assessing Authority:The respondent, as the assessing authority under the KGST Act, was responsible for passing the impugned order. The court dismissed the petitioner's claim that only Sales Tax Officers could be assessing authorities under the Act, deeming it a technical irregularity without prejudice to the petitioner's case.6. Claim for Reduction of Tax Paid:The petitioner sought a reduction of tax paid in the purchasing State while determining the tax due under the Act. The court directed the assessing authority to consider this claim based on relevant materials and bills.7. Exigibility to Tax on Tractor:The petitioner argued that the tractor purchased and registered outside the State was not liable to tax under the Act unless brought into the State for use or sale. The court directed the assessing authority to reassess the petitioner's claim regarding the tractor's liability to tax under the Act.In conclusion, the court disposed of the original petition, directing the assessing authority to review the assessment of both the JCB loader and the tractor, consider the petitioner's claims for reduction of tax paid, and reassess the liability to tax on the tractor purchased and registered outside the State.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found