Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the Kara Samadhan Scheme, amounts already deposited during pendency of the appeal could be treated as compliance with the stipulated deposit condition so as to entitle the assessee to waiver of the balance penalty and interest.
Analysis: The Scheme required payment of the specified percentage of penalty and interest, but condition No. 7 expressly provided that where an assessee had already paid tax, penalty, or interest in excess of the amounts specified, the Scheme would stand modified to that extent and apply to the balance amounts. Reading the conditions together, earlier deposits could not be ignored or treated as irrelevant. The effect of condition No. 7 was to prevent duplication of payment and to ensure that amounts already paid were adjusted towards the prescribed requirement. A contrary reading would penalise an assessee who had made higher earlier payments and would defeat the object of the Scheme.
Conclusion: The earlier deposit satisfied the Scheme requirement to the extent of the prescribed payment, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of waiver for the balance.
Final Conclusion: The endorsement denying the benefit under the Scheme was unsustainable, and the writ petition succeeded with a direction to treat the earlier deposit as compliance under condition No. 7.
Ratio Decidendi: A beneficial tax remission scheme must be read so that prior payments in excess of the prescribed minimum are adjusted towards compliance, and an assessee cannot be required to make an additional payment merely because the earlier deposit was made before the scheme came into force.