2006 (1) TMI 553 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

High Court sets aside reassessment orders under Bihar Finance Act, 1981 for lack of independent decision-making

Bharat Agriculture & Mechanical Engineering Company Versus State of Bihar and another

The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the reassessment orders and demand notices for two assessment periods under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981. ... - Issues:Appeal against reassessment orders passed by Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes under section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 for two assessment periods. Grounds of appeal: lack of jurisdiction in initiating reassessment proceeding and eligibility for exemption of sprayers as agricultural implements.Analysis:The appellant, a manufacturer and seller of agricultural implements like sprayers, sold primarily to Government Departments during the assessment periods. Initially, the competent authority accepted the appellant's position of nil sales tax liability. However, an audit objection later claimed sprayers were not entitled to exemption as agricultural implements. Consequently, reassessment proceedings were initiated under section 19(1) of the Act.The appellant challenged the reassessment orders on two grounds before the writ court: lack of jurisdiction due to audit objection not fulfilling statutory requirements, and eligibility for exemption as agricultural implements despite not being specifically listed. The single Judge upheld the reassessment orders, considering the reference to the exemption notice as sufficient information for reassessment under section 19(1) of the Act.The appeal primarily focused on the jurisdictional issue, arguing that a mere reference to the exemption notification did not constitute new information for reassessment. The High Court found the reasoning flawed, citing Supreme Court precedent that information must lead to a belief of income escaping assessment. Moreover, the reassessment orders lacked independent application of mind by the authority, merely following the audit objection without proper evaluation.The High Court concluded that the reassessment orders failed to meet the standard of independent decision-making required by law. As a result, the orders were deemed invalid, and the appeals were allowed, setting aside the reassessment orders and demand notices for the assessment periods in question.