Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        2000 (2) TMI 819 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        State tax on electricity sales cannot extend to inter-State supply, but in-State delivery point supported the demand and penalty. A State may tax sale of electricity only within its territorial competence; a statutory definition that extends the levy to transmission or supply outside ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            State tax on electricity sales cannot extend to inter-State supply, but in-State delivery point supported the demand and penalty.

                            A State may tax sale of electricity only within its territorial competence; a statutory definition that extends the levy to transmission or supply outside the State is ultra vires to that extent. Applying Article 246, Entry 53 of List II, and Article 286(1), the Court noted that inter-State or extra-State sales fall outside State taxing power, so section 2(g) was unconstitutional only insofar as it covered supplies outside Manipur. On the demand and penalty, the delivery point was found to be within Manipur, the absence of framed rules did not invalidate the demand, and penalty relief was left to the statutory remission power.




                            Issues: (i) whether section 2(g) of the Manipur Tax on Sale of Electricity Act, 1984 was ultra vires insofar as it treated transmission or supply of electricity outside the State as a taxable sale and whether the State had competence to levy tax on such inter-State sale of electricity; (ii) whether the impugned demand and penalty under the Act were illegal for want of rules and on the footing that the supply to the beneficiary States was outside Manipur.

                            Issue (i): whether section 2(g) of the Manipur Tax on Sale of Electricity Act, 1984 was ultra vires insofar as it treated transmission or supply of electricity outside the State as a taxable sale and whether the State had competence to levy tax on such inter-State sale of electricity.

                            Analysis: The constitutional scheme under Article 246 read with Entry 53 of List II permits State taxation on consumption or sale of electricity within the State, but Article 286(1) prohibits a State from imposing tax on sales taking place outside the State. Power over inter-State sale or purchase lies in the Union field, and the State Legislature cannot enlarge its taxing reach to cover transmission or supply outside Manipur. The definition in section 2(g), to the extent that it included transmission or supply of electricity outside the State, therefore travelled beyond the State's legislative competence.

                            Conclusion: The provision was held unconstitutional and ultra vires only to the extent it purported to cover transmission or supply of electricity outside Manipur; the State's power to tax sale of electricity within the State was upheld.

                            Issue (ii): whether the impugned demand and penalty under the Act were illegal for want of rules and on the footing that the supply to the beneficiary States was outside Manipur.

                            Analysis: The Court found that the delivery point for supply to the bulk consumers was at Loktak station in Manipur, and the points at Dimapur and the Assam stations were only for measurement of consumption. On that footing, the impugned demand was not shown to be infirm. The absence of framed rules was not accepted as a ground to invalidate the demand, and the statutory penalty could not be struck down in the writ proceeding. At the same time, section 6 vested discretion in the competent Government to remit the whole or part of the penalty in special cases, and the petitioner was left to pursue that statutory remedy.

                            Conclusion: The impugned demand and penalty were upheld, subject to the petitioner's liberty to seek remission of penalty from the Government under section 6.

                            Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded only to a limited extent on the constitutional challenge to section 2(g) insofar as it extended to sales outside the State, while the tax demand and penalty were otherwise sustained and the petitioner was given liberty to seek remission of penalty under the Act.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A State can levy tax on sale of electricity only within its territorial competence, and any statutory definition that purports to tax inter-State or extra-State sales is ultra vires; however, where the delivery point is within the State and the demand is otherwise supported by the statute, the assessment or demand will not be quashed merely because rules are not framed, and penalty relief must be sought under the statutory remission power.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found