Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amendment to rule 8(4)(c)(ii) of the Delhi Sales Tax Rules, 1975, which enabled withholding of statutory declaration forms from dealers in tax arrears, was within the rule-making power conferred by section 71 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975.
Analysis: The Act conferred on a dealer a substantive statutory mechanism for excluding sales to registered dealers for resale from taxable turnover, subject to furnishing the prescribed declaration form. Section 71 authorised rules only for carrying out the purposes of the Act, and the enumerated topics in section 71(2) were illustrative of that limited power. The amendment did not merely regulate procedure for obtaining forms; it introduced a disqualification based on tax default and permitted denial of forms in circumstances not contemplated by the Act. Such withholding could defeat the dealer's statutory right and shift the tax burden contrary to the legislative scheme. A rule framed under delegated power cannot curtail or nullify a right created by the parent Act.
Conclusion: The amended rule was held to be beyond the scope of the delegated rule-making power and therefore ultra vires.
Ratio Decidendi: A delegated rule that withdraws or materially impairs a substantive right created by the parent Act, instead of merely carrying out its purposes, is ultra vires.