Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court of Gujarat quashes assessment time extension, upholds chicory roots tax exemption.</h1> <h3>Oagkan Traders Versus Sales Tax Officer</h3> Oagkan Traders Versus Sales Tax Officer - [2003] 133 STC 180 (Guj) Issues:1. Validity of extending the period of limitation for completing assessment.2. Interpretation of the reasons for extending the time-limit.3. Applicability of the decision in Fag Precision Bearings v. Sales Tax Officer.4. Merit of the case regarding the exemption of chicory roots under the State law.Issue 1: Validity of extending the period of limitation for completing assessmentThe petitioner, a partnership-firm engaged in the sale of chicory roots, challenged the order extending the period for completing assessment for the years 1975 to 1979. The Commissioner extended the limitation citing the need for more time to complete the inquiry under the Sales Tax Acts. The key question was whether the order showed a valid foundation for the extension. The court referred to the decision in Fag Precision Bearings v. Sales Tax Officer, emphasizing that the power to extend assessment proceedings can only be exercised in extraordinary circumstances. The court concluded that the reasons provided in the order were not sufficient to justify the extension, leading to the quashing of the impugned order.Issue 2: Interpretation of the reasons for extending the time-limitThe court analyzed the reasons stated in the order for extending the time-limit for assessment. It noted that the mere statement of needing more time without specifying extraordinary circumstances was insufficient. Drawing from the Fag Precision Bearings case, the court highlighted that the authorities cannot bypass statutory time limits due to their own delays. The court emphasized the need for valid reasons beyond mere pending assessment proceedings to justify an extension. Ultimately, the court found the reasons provided in the order lacking and ruled in favor of the petitioner.Issue 3: Applicability of the decision in Fag Precision Bearings v. Sales Tax OfficerThe court extensively discussed the decision in Fag Precision Bearings v. Sales Tax Officer, where the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of valid reasons for extending assessment proceedings. The court highlighted the requirement for extraordinary circumstances beyond delays by tax authorities to warrant an extension. By applying the principles from this case to the present scenario, the court concluded that the impugned order extending the period of limitation could not be sustained due to insufficient reasons provided.Issue 4: Merit of the case regarding the exemption of chicory roots under the State lawAlthough not the primary issue, the court addressed the merit of the case concerning the exemption of chicory roots under the State law. It referenced a Supreme Court decision affirming the exemption of chicory roots under entry 23 of Schedule I of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. The court clarified that the petitioner's sales of chicory roots were generally exempt from taxation under the State law. Despite the Revenue's argument regarding the Tribunal's differing views, the court held that the petitioner was not obligated to abandon their claim to exemption based on subsequent decisions. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and vacated any assessment orders made as a result of the interim order.In conclusion, the High Court of Gujarat ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for extending the period of limitation for completing assessments. The court also reaffirmed the exemption of chicory roots from taxation under the State law, providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal principles and precedents involved in the judgment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found