Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether raw materials purchased at concessional rate against declaration forms by a registered manufacturer could be used for manufacturing goods not specified in the certificate of registration, and whether rejection of further declaration forms and issuance of show-cause notices were justified.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 17(2)(b)(ii) of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 and rule 8 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995 shows that the certificate of registration is not confined to raw materials alone; in the case of a manufacturer it also operates with reference to the products intended to be manufactured. The requirement that raw materials be purchased for use in the manufacture of taxable goods does not mean that the dealer may use them to produce any goods of choice irrespective of the products recorded in the registration certificate. The registration certificate, read with the obligation to report changes in the class of goods under section 97(c), makes the specified products a material part of the registered activity. A dealer cannot go beyond the bounds of the certificate and still claim the benefit of concessional purchases. On the facts, the applicants used the raw materials to manufacture goods not mentioned in the registration certificate, which amounted to misuse of declaration forms and attracted the statutory consequences.
Conclusion: The raw materials purchased at concessional rate could not be used for manufacturing goods not specified in the registration certificate, and the rejection of the declaration forms and the show-cause notices were justified. The decision is against the assessee.