Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether furnace oil sold against a declaration in form I and covered by an endorsement in the purchasing dealer's registration certificate remained exempt or taxable merely because the purchasing dealer did not use it as declared.
Analysis: The proviso to section 5(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 protects the selling dealer once the goods are specified in the purchasing dealer's registration certificate and the prescribed declaration is furnished. The selling dealer is not required to verify the ultimate use of the goods by the purchaser. If the purchasing dealer misuses the goods, the statutory consequence falls on the purchasing dealer and not on the seller. The assessed turnover was therefore rightly deducted in the original assessment and the reopening under section 12(8) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The question was answered in favour of the assessee. The selling dealer was not liable to pay tax on the sale of furnace oil once the requisite declaration and registration endorsement were in place, even if the purchasing dealer used the goods contrary to the declaration.
Final Conclusion: The reference was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A selling dealer is entitled to concessional or nil tax treatment when the purchasing dealer furnishes the prescribed declaration and the goods are specified in the registration certificate; the seller is not responsible for the purchaser's subsequent misapplication of the goods.