Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Sales Tax Officer had authority to collect tax from the carrier or the petitioner under the transit inspection provisions, and whether the collection could stand in the absence of notice, opportunity, and material showing reason to believe evasion of tax.
Analysis: The relevant provisions empowered inspection, unloading, seizure, and confiscation only where the goods were in transit and the officer was duly empowered by the Commissioner, with action predicated on reason to believe that tax evasion had occurred. The record did not clearly show that the officer who made the collection had the requisite empowerment, and the materials also did not satisfactorily establish that the collection was preceded by notice or opportunity to the affected person. The court noted that the dispute over whether the goods were still in transit and whether the collection was voluntary or unauthorized required the petitioner to place the relevant material before the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The matter was not finally adjudicated on the legality of the collection at that stage, and the petitioner was directed to appear before the Sales Tax Officer to raise the jurisdictional objections and seek refund if the collection was found unauthorized.