Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>AO's Jurisdiction Limited: Intimation Issued After Notice Under 143(2) Invalid</h1> The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked jurisdiction to issue an intimation under section 143(1)(a) after issuing a notice under ... Assessment Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in issuing intimation under section 143(1)(a) after issuing notice under section 143(2).2. Validity of prima facie adjustments made by the Assessing Officer.3. Interpretation of sections 143(1)(a) and 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.4. Compliance with principles of natural justice.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in issuing intimation under section 143(1)(a) after issuing notice under section 143(2):The primary legal issue was whether the Assessing Officer (AO) had the jurisdiction to issue an intimation under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, after a notice under section 143(2) had already been issued. The Tribunal relied on the Calcutta High Court decision in Modern Fibotex India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [1995] 212 ITR 496, which held that once a notice under section 143(2) is issued, the AO cannot proceed with prima facie adjustments and issue an intimation under section 143(1)(a). The High Court agreed with this interpretation, emphasizing that the issuance of a notice under section 143(2) indicates that the AO is proceeding with a scrutiny assessment, and thus, issuing an intimation under section 143(1)(a) would be against the principles of natural justice.2. Validity of prima facie adjustments made by the Assessing Officer:The AO made adjustments to the assessee's return, reducing the declared loss by Rs. 2,61,46,500, which included depreciation on building and plant & machinery not shown in the balance sheet, and entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal quashed the intimation under section 143(1)(a) on the grounds that such adjustments and the subsequent intimation were without jurisdiction once the notice under section 143(2) was issued. The High Court upheld this view, indicating that the AO's action in making these adjustments and issuing the intimation was not justified.3. Interpretation of sections 143(1)(a) and 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The High Court provided a detailed interpretation of sections 143(1)(a) and 143(2). Section 143(1)(a) allows the AO to make adjustments based on the return filed and issue an intimation, which acts as a demand notice under section 156. However, this is 'without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (2),' meaning that if a notice under section 143(2) has been issued, the AO should not resort to section 143(1)(a). The Court emphasized that the legislative intent was to ensure that the AO, after initiating scrutiny under section 143(2), should proceed with a regular assessment under section 143(3) and not revert to the summary assessment process of section 143(1)(a).4. Compliance with principles of natural justice:The Court highlighted that switching from a scrutiny assessment process (section 143(2)) to a summary adjustment and intimation (section 143(1)(a)) would take the assessee by surprise and violate principles of natural justice. The Court noted that the expression 'without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (2)' in section 143(1)(a) preserves the AO's power to proceed with a regular assessment under section 143(2), ensuring that the assessee has an opportunity to be heard and present evidence.Conclusion:The High Court concluded that the AO's action of issuing an intimation under section 143(1)(a) after initiating proceedings under section 143(2) was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal's decision to quash the intimation was upheld, and the reference was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and the correct interpretation of statutory provisions to ensure justice.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found