Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax was leviable on the sale of a ship, held as a capital asset, effected by a shipping company prior to 16 August 1985.
Analysis: The sale was an isolated disposal of a capital asset and was not part of, or incidental to, the assessee's business of carrying passengers and cargo. The legal position, as understood in the relevant trade circulars and in the earlier judicial view on sales of capital assets, was that such transactions were not liable to sales tax for the period before the statutory amendment made the wider definition of dealer/business operative from 16 August 1985. The later curative and relief measures concerning past transactions also supported the conclusion that tax was not leviable on such earlier sales where no tax had been separately collected.
Conclusion: No sales tax was leviable on the sale of the ship before 16 August 1985, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A sale of a capital asset by a shipping company, when unconnected with its ordinary trading activity and made before the operative statutory expansion of liability, is not exigible to sales tax merely because the seller is a registered dealer.