TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeals due to lack of evidence, finding appellants' denial credible.</h1> <h3>M/s. Met India Versus CCE Daman</h3> M/s. Met India Versus CCE Daman - TMI Issues involved: Excess stock of copper rods found during physical verification, imposition of penalties on appellants, redemption fine in lieu of confiscation.Excess Stock Issue: The officers found 3,505 kgs of excess copper rods during physical verification, leading to penalties imposed on the first appellant and the partners. The appellants claimed that the excess was due to accounting copper rods as copper bars in the RG-1 Register. The partner admitted to the shortage but explained that it was cleared illicitly. The appellants maintained consistency in their statements, denying the existence of excess stock.Parties' Arguments: The appellants argued that the excess was a result of accounting copper rods as copper bars, which was supported by the partner's statement and the authorized signatory's lack of knowledge during the search. The Revenue contended that the excess stock was intended for illicit removal, based on the partner's admission of illicit removal of goods found short.Judgment: The Tribunal considered the consistency in the appellants' statements and the lack of evidence from the Revenue to refute the claim of accounting copper rods as copper bars. The Commissioner's observation regarding the authorized signatory's agreement with the stock-taking method was found to be not based on facts. As no excess was conclusively found during the officers' visit, the impugned order was set aside, and all appeals were allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
