1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Judge rules toughened glass screens as unclassified item, not glassware.</h1> The judge ruled in favor of the applicant, classifying the glass screens as an unclassified item rather than under item 39 of the notification dated May ... - Issues: Classification of glass screen under item 39 of notification dated 20th May, 1976 or as an unclassified item.Analysis:1. Controversy: The main issue in this case is whether the glass screen manufactured by the company falls under item 39 of the notification dated 20th May, 1976 or should be treated as an unclassified item.2. Applicant's Argument: The applicant argues that the glass screen is an unclassified item and does not fall under entry 39, citing previous Supreme Court decisions regarding classification of glass mirrors.3. Revenue's Argument: The Revenue contends that the glass screens fall under the category of 'All goods and wares made of glass' and should be classified accordingly. They argue that the toughening process transforms the glass sheets into a new product.4. Legal Provisions: The relevant entries from the Central Excises and Salt Act and the notification dated May 20, 1976 are examined to determine the classification of the glass screens.5. Supreme Court Decision: The Supreme Court's previous decision in a similar case involving glass mirrors is referenced, where it was held that the screens cannot be classified as 'glass or glassware' but rather as motor vehicle parts.6. Judicial Analysis: The judge refers to the Supreme Court's decision and concludes that the glass screens are more akin to glass-panes and should be excluded from item 39. The judge aligns with the Supreme Court's view that the screens are a new product and fall under the unclassified category.7. Tribunal's Error: The judge criticizes the Tribunal for making a distinction between the pre and post-1976 notification, stating that the categories of glassware remain the same. The judge sets aside the Tribunal's decision and allows the revision, taxing the toughened glass sheets as an unclassified item.8. Conclusion: The judge allows the revision, setting aside the Tribunal's order and ruling that the toughened glass sheets are to be taxed as an unclassified item. No costs are awarded in this case.