Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 was sustainable when no fresh material, distinct from the material available at the time of the original assessment, had come to the notice of the successor assessing authority.
Analysis: Reassessment under section 14(4) is justified only when material not available at the time of the original assessment subsequently comes to the notice of the authority from an external source or otherwise after the assessment. If the relevant material was already on record and the original assessing authority failed to advert to it because of lack of diligence or non-application of mind, that circumstance does not confer power to reopen the assessment under section 14(4). The basis of the power is the later emergence of material, not merely the discovery that the earlier assessment was careless.
Conclusion: Reassessment was not valid because no fresh material had emerged after the original assessment; the order could not be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment was held to be without jurisdiction on the facts, and the revision succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Power of reassessment under section 14(4) cannot be invoked merely to correct an earlier omission or lack of diligence when the relevant material was already available at the time of the original assessment; it requires subsequent discovery of fresh material.