Implied sale of packing material not proved, while coal tar sales were held to be inter-State transactions.

Where fertiliser was sold in polythene bags, no implied sale of the packing material was made out because there was no legal requirement to use a particular container, the bag value was insignificant, and the record showed no intention to treat the bags as separately sold or as part of the sale price. Tax could not be levied on the alleged packing material value, and the issue was decided for the assessee. On the coal tar transactions, the sale to Shalimar Tar Products was held to be inter-State under the governing sales tax principles, so the issue was decided for the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether there was an implied sale of packing material along with the fertilisers; (ii) Whether the sales of coal tar to Shalimar Tar Products were intra-State or inter-State sales.

Issue (i): Whether there was an implied sale of packing material along with the fertilisers.

Analysis: The applicable test was whether the transaction showed an intention to sell the packing material as part of the sale of the goods, or whether the container was separately sold, integrated into a composite sale, or merely transferred without any sale consideration. On the facts, there was no legal requirement to pack fertiliser in any particular container, the container price was insignificant, and no material supported an inference that the parties intended a sale of the polythene bags or that their value formed part of the product price.

Conclusion: There was no implied sale of packing material, and tax could not be levied on the alleged price of the packing material; the answer is in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the sales of coal tar to Shalimar Tar Products were intra-State or inter-State sales.

Analysis: The finding that the sale of coal tar was inter-State was consistent with the governing principle applied in the relevant sales tax law and with the controlling legal position on inter-State transactions.

Conclusion: The sale of coal tar was an inter-State sale; the answer is in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by negating the alleged implied sale of packing material while affirming the inter-State character of the coal tar sales.

Ratio Decidendi: Whether packing material forms part of a taxable sale depends on the factual indicia of a separately intended or composite sale, and absent evidence of such intention or consideration, no implied sale of the container can be inferred.

---