Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether converting plain paper into exercise books and bound books amounts to manufacture under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, and whether the earlier view treating the activity as mere processing stated the correct position of law.
Analysis: The activity involved cutting, rolling, stitching, sizing and binding plain paper into marketable exercise books and bound books by machinery and labour. Applying the settled principle that manufacture occurs where a commercially different commodity emerges with a distinct identity, use and commercial incidents, the conversion of paper into exercise books was held to be a manufacturing process and not a mere change in form. The later statutory insertion of the definition of manufacture was treated as explanatory and clarificatory, supporting the view that processing is included within manufacture. The earlier contrary view was found inconsistent with the proper legal test.
Conclusion: The activity amounts to manufacture, and the earlier decision holding otherwise does not lay down the correct legal position.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the petitioners on the substantive issue of manufacture, and the matters were sent back for fresh decision on their own merits in light of that conclusion.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a process converts paper into exercise books or bound books so that a distinct commercially known commodity emerges, the activity is manufacture rather than mere processing, and a later clarificatory definition may be treated as reflecting the existing legal position.