Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Government not bound by alleged tax exemption promise for raw material purchases. Petitions dismissed.</h1> <h3>Vishnu Khandsari Udyog Versus Government of Gujarat</h3> The court held that the government did not promise exemption from purchase tax under section 18 for purchases of raw materials, including sugarcane. As ... - Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to exemption from sales tax on raw materials, including sugarcane.2. Applicability of the doctrine of promissory estoppel.3. Interpretation of government resolutions dated 22nd December 1977 and 27th August 1980.4. Validity of the notification dated 5th February 1981 under section 49 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.5. Effect of eligibility certificates and government promises on tax exemptions.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Exemption from Sales Tax on Raw Materials, Including Sugarcane:The petitioners contended that, based on government resolutions dated 22nd December 1977 and 27th August 1980, they were entitled to purchase raw materials, including sugarcane, free of sales tax. They argued that the resolutions provided for exemption from sales tax on raw materials, packing materials, and processing materials used in manufacturing khandsari. However, the respondents refused to grant this benefit for the purchase of sugarcane.2. Applicability of the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel:The petitioners based their claim on the doctrine of promissory estoppel, arguing that the government had made a clear representation through its resolutions that new industrial units would be entitled to purchase raw materials without payment of purchase tax. The petitioners claimed that they had acted on this promise and invested in their industries.3. Interpretation of Government Resolutions Dated 22nd December 1977 and 27th August 1980:The court examined the relevant parts of the resolutions to determine whether the government had promised exemption from purchase tax under any section, including section 18 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. The resolutions stated that new small-scale industrial units could purchase raw materials free of tax upon obtaining eligibility and sales tax exemption certificates. However, the court found no words of limitation suggesting that raw materials excluded sugarcane.4. Validity of the Notification Dated 5th February 1981 Under Section 49 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969:The petitioners initially challenged the validity of the notification dated 5th February 1981, which granted exemption from purchase tax under section 15 but not under section 18. However, they later withdrew this challenge, focusing instead on the doctrine of promissory estoppel.5. Effect of Eligibility Certificates and Government Promises on Tax Exemptions:The court noted that the eligibility certificates were granted based on the resolutions, which did not explicitly promise exemption from purchase tax under section 18. The court observed that the petitioners had not sought clarification or raised concerns about the lack of exemption under section 18 until much later. The court concluded that the government had only promised exemption from purchase tax under section 15, not section 18.Conclusion:The court held that the government had not made a representation or promise that exemption from payment of purchase tax under section 18 of the Act was available for purchases of raw materials, including sugarcane. The petitioners did not understand the government's representation in that manner and did not alter their position based on such a promise. Therefore, the petitions were dismissed, and the rule issued in each petition was discharged with no order as to costs. The interim relief was vacated.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found