Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after a limited remand confined to re-examination of declarations and credit notes, the assessee could file a revised return and introduce an additional claim not covered by the remand.
Analysis: The assessment had attained finality on all matters except those specifically sent back for reconsideration. Section 14(2) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 and rule 9(2)(a) of the Central Sales Tax (Bihar) Rules, 1957 were held to operate where the assessing authority is otherwise empowered to make a fresh assessment, but they do not enlarge a jurisdiction that has been expressly restricted by a remand order. The remand in question was limited and did not reopen the entire assessment, so the assessing officer could deal only with the declarations and credit notes directed to be examined. An additional claim unrelated to that limited remit could not be entertained.
Conclusion: The assessing officer had no jurisdiction to go beyond the scope of the limited remand, and the additional claim raised in the revised return was not entertainable.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, affirming that a restricted remand does not permit reassessment of matters already finalised.
Ratio Decidendi: A remand confined to specified issues preserves the finality of the remaining assessment, and the assessing authority cannot enlarge its jurisdiction by treating a limited remand as an open remand.