Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court: IT Commissioner can impose penalty under Income Tax Act, overturns ITAT decision</h1> The High Court of Madras held that the Income Tax Appellate Commissioner had jurisdiction to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act ... Penalty The High Court of Madras ruled that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was incorrect in holding that the Income Tax Appellate Commissioner had no jurisdiction to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act after the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975. The court held in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Commissioner retained jurisdiction to levy the penalty. The Tribunal was directed to reconsider the case on its merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
