TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Modvat Credit Allowed for Computers Used in Production & Office</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI Versus ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.</h3> The tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority's decision to grant Modvat credit on capital goods, specifically computers, used for both manufacturing ... - Issues: Modvat credit on capital goods used for office purposesAnalysis:The issue in this case revolves around the eligibility of Modvat credit on capital goods, specifically computers, used for both manufacturing and office purposes. The lower appellate authority had allowed the Modvat credit, prompting the department to appeal. The department argued that since the computer system was utilized for office purposes as well, the Modvat credit should not be granted. On the other hand, the respondents contended that the rules did not specify such a limitation and installation in the factory satisfied the requirement. Both parties presented their arguments before the tribunal.The tribunal carefully considered the arguments from both sides and examined the report provided by the jurisdictional range officer. The report highlighted that the impugned computer system was extensively used for various production-related activities such as inventory control, material planning, stores, purchases, drawing structures, and designs, indicating its connection with the production of finished goods. Based on this evidence, the tribunal concluded that the computer system was indeed being used in connection with the production process, justifying the grant of Modvat credit.In its decision, the tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority's order, emphasizing that the impugned computer system's usage for production-related activities demonstrated its eligibility for Modvat credit. The tribunal rejected the department's appeal, thereby affirming the lower appellate authority's decision to grant the Modvat credit on the capital goods in question.In conclusion, the tribunal's judgment clarifies the eligibility criteria for Modvat credit on capital goods used for both manufacturing and office purposes. The decision underscores the importance of the actual usage of the goods in connection with production activities to determine entitlement to Modvat credit, rather than mere installation in the factory premises.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
