Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court upholds Tribunal findings on works contract, dismissal of enhancement petition, & tax exemption in import sales</h1> <h3>State of Tamil Nadu Versus Ashok Leyland Limited</h3> The High Court upheld the Tribunal's findings on three issues: the supply of raw materials was considered a works contract, the dismissal of the ... - Issues Involved:1. Whether the supply of raw materials by the assessees to their customers on purchase orders were towards works contract not exigible to tax or whether they are sales exigible to tax.2. Whether the dismissal of the enhancement petition filed by the State is right in respect of turnover where original invoices had been cancelled and fresh invoices raised for the sale of vehicles.3. Whether the transactions amounting to Rs. 5,13,968.53 are sales in the course of import and are exempt from taxation.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Supply of Raw Materials - Works Contract vs. SalesThe primary issue is whether the supply of raw materials by the assessees to ancillary industries for the manufacture of component parts is a works contract or an outright sale. The Tribunal held that these transactions were works contracts and not sales, and thus not exigible to tax. The Tribunal's decision was based on the pattern of transactions, where raw materials were supplied by the assessees, and debit notes were issued, which were later cancelled by credit notes upon the return of finished products. The Tribunal relied on precedents such as *P.A. Raju Chettiar and Brothers v. State of Madras* and *South India Metal Works and Rolling Mills v. State of Madras*, which established that the essence of the transaction, rather than the nomenclature, determines its nature. The Tribunal's conclusion was deemed unassailable, as the transactions were found to be purely for services rendered by the ancillary manufacturers, with no element of sale involved.Issue 2: Dismissal of Enhancement Petition - Turnover and InvoicesThe second issue concerns the dismissal of the State's enhancement petition regarding the turnover where original invoices were cancelled, and fresh invoices were raised. The assessing authority initially disallowed the claim under sales returns for which credit notes had been issued. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner found that the original invoices were cancelled, and fresh invoices were raised, including the taxable turnover, and tax was paid under the local Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld this finding, noting that the assessees did not act as agents for the original buyers and that the subsequent sales were genuine transactions. The Tribunal's conclusion was that the assessees had paid the appropriate taxes, and thus the exemption granted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was justified.Issue 3: Transactions in the Course of ImportThe third issue revolves around whether transactions amounting to Rs. 5,13,968.53 were sales in the course of import and thus exempt from taxation. The Tribunal held that these transactions were indeed sales in the course of import. The assessees had entered into contracts with Ashok Leyland, U.K., and the goods were imported against actual user's licenses held by the Tamil Nadu State Transport Department and Southern Railway. The Tribunal relied on several precedents, including *Voltas Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer* and *S.R.L.G.S. & W. Mills (P.) Ltd. v. State of Madras*, which established that if the import was occasioned by the sale, it would be deemed a sale in the course of import. The Tribunal concluded that the assessees acted as agents of the actual users and that the sales were inextricably linked to the import, thus qualifying for exemption under Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act.ConclusionThe High Court upheld the Tribunal's findings on all three issues, ruling against the revenue. The supply of raw materials was deemed a works contract, the dismissal of the enhancement petition was justified, and the transactions in question were sales in the course of import, exempt from taxation. The tax revision case was dismissed, with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found