Electrical goods classification for rectifiers upheld where their design had a direct nexus with electricity use.

Rectifiers were treated as electrical goods for sales tax classification because the decisive test was their purpose and design, not merely whether they consumed electricity. As they converted alternating current into direct current for industrial and other electrical applications, they had a direct nexus with the utilisation of electricity and fell within entry 20 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Their specialised nature and absence from ordinary bazaar trade did not justify resort to the residuary entry. On common parlance and trade understanding, they were not residuary goods, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether rectifiers manufactured and sold by the applicants were classifiable as electrical goods under entry 20 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, or fell under the residuary entry 22 of Schedule E.

Analysis: The decisive test for classification was not whether the goods consumed electricity, but whether their purpose and design had a direct nexus with the production, transmission, utilisation, or consumption of electricity. Rectifiers were used to convert alternating current into direct current for industrial and other electrical applications, and therefore had a direct connection with the utilisation of electricity. The fact that they were specialised goods, not sold in the ordinary bazaar trade, did not take them out of the category of electrical goods. On both common parlance and trade understanding, they were properly regarded as electrical goods rather than residuary goods.

Conclusion: Rectifiers were held to fall under entry 20 of Schedule C and not under entry 22 of Schedule E; the answer to the reference was in the affirmative, in favour of the Revenue and against the applicants.

---