Commissioner (Appeals) empowered to remand cases post amendment. CESTAT CHENNAI affirms order. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand a case despite the amendment of Section 35A(3) of the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Commissioner (Appeals) empowered to remand cases post amendment. CESTAT CHENNAI affirms order.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand a case despite the amendment of Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned order.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the power of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand a case even after the amendment of Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the Gujarat High Court's ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I v. Medico Labs and the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Umesh Dhaimode. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned order.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.