Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit was admissible on the capital goods, namely Ziricon Oxygen Probe, Polymer Conductivity Analiser/Censor and Cable Tray, on the ground that they were components or parts of the plant used in the manufacturing process.
Analysis: The goods were found to be used as components of the plant. The Board's Circular dated 2-12-1996, as relied upon by the appellants, clarified that components and accessories of specified goods are entitled to credit irrespective of classification. On that basis, denial of credit on the disputed capital goods was unsustainable.
Conclusion: Credit on the disputed capital goods was admissible and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.