Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tribunal waives penalties for Exporter and CHA, penalizes Shipping Line for documentation lapse. Penalty reduced to 40%.</h1> The Tribunal waived penalties for the Exporter and CHA but penalized the Shipping Line for loading containers without necessary documentation. The ... Non-filing of shipping bills - vessel sailed without the LEO from the proper officer of the Customs - redemption fine and penalty imposed on the exporter - penalties imposed on the CHA and the Shipping Line - Held that: - As per Section 34 of the Customs Act, 1962 the goods shall not be loaded except under the supervision of the proper officer. It is not clarified by the learned JDR how the containers were allowed to be loaded on the vessel without Shipping Bill and the LEO. Further more as per paragraph 11 of the impugned order wherein the shipping line has admitted that they were informed by the CHA that the Shipping Bills were processed at Custom House and would be delivered by tomorrow i.e. on 4-1-2007 and on 4-1-2007 the LEO was obtained - the penalties imposed on the Exporter and the CHA are waived of. Redemption fine imposed on the Exporter - Held that: - the goods are not physically available and are not being exported under any bond, the goods cannot be confiscated - redemption fine not imposable. Penalty on shipping line - Held that: - the Shipping Line has loaded the containers on the vessel without obtaining the LEO which is in contravention of Customs Law for such act they are liable for the penal action - in the case of CSAV Group Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & ors. [2009 (7) TMI 165 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY] the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in similar facts and circumstances, considering the case as technical breach and the penalties imposed on the Shipping Line were reduced to 40% - penalty reduced to 40% i.e. β‚Ή 2,80,000/- on the Shipping Line. Appeal allowed - decided partly in favor of appellant. Issues involved:Imposition of redemption fine and penalty under Sections 125 and 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the Exporter, CHA, and Shipping Line for loading containers on a vessel without obtaining the LEO.Detailed Analysis:1. Imposition of Redemption Fine and Penalty:The case involved appeals by the Exporter, CHA, and Shipping Line against the imposition of redemption fine and penalties for loading containers on a vessel without obtaining the LEO. The Exporter exported three containers which were loaded on the vessel without the necessary documentation, leading to the imposition of fines and penalties. The CHA and Shipping Line were also penalized for their roles in the incident.2. Arguments by the Parties:The learned Advocates for the CHA and Shipping Line argued that there was no evidence of connivance or ulterior motives in loading the containers without the LEO. They contended that the CHA had no control over the loading process and were not aware of the violation. The Revenue, represented by the JDR, argued that all parties were aware of the violation and cited previous cases where penalties were confirmed in similar circumstances.3. Judicial Analysis:The Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the containers were indeed loaded without the LEO, contrary to Section 34 of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the Tribunal noted that the CHA had informed the Shipping Line about the pending documentation, indicating a lack of fault on their part. The Tribunal also considered the absence of physical goods for confiscation and cited a previous judgment to support waiving the redemption fine on the Exporter.4. Decision and Disposition:The Tribunal waived the penalties imposed on the Exporter and CHA, considering the circumstances and lack of evidence of intentional wrongdoing. However, the Shipping Line was found liable for the violation and penalized. Citing a previous High Court judgment, the Tribunal reduced the penalty on the Shipping Line to 40% of the original amount. The appeals were disposed of based on these findings.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the legal aspects of loading containers without the necessary documentation, analyzing the roles of the Exporter, CHA, and Shipping Line in the incident and determining appropriate penalties based on the circumstances and legal precedents.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found